Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Aperture 3 — Places And iPhone GPS

Aperture — Places

I’ve never really paid much attention to geo-tagging my photos, mostly because I didn’t have an easy way to do so. One of Aperture 3’s new features—one that was a very pleasant surprise—is the way that it can pull in GPS data from existing iPhone photos. It’s really brilliant in its simplicity.

I would guess that a very high percentage of Aperture users are also iPhone owners. This means that all you need to do is snap a single iPhone photo at your shooting location, and you can then use the GPS data from that photo to tag other SLR photos from the same location in Aperture. You don’t even need to import the photos from your phone into Aperture. You simply pull up a mini-browser that shows you the images on your iPhone (which has to be connected at the time). From there you select the image, creating a spot on the map. You can then assign as many other photos in your Aperture library as you’d like to this spot.

I’ve been hoping for years that to find an iPhone app that takes your location from the iPhone’s GPS, saves it, and then allows you to sync it back to your photos. (There may actually be something like this now.) This is much better. Viewing the photos on the iPhone’s camera roll is a quick and easy way to find the exact location, visually, that you are looking for.

I recently visited Los Angeles, and we went for a hike to the Griffith Observatory. I took a bunch of photos with my SLR on the way up, and from the observatory at the top. I also took a few along the way with my iPhone, but that’s all I needed. With those few iPhone photos, Aperture can pull the GPS info, and I can tag all the rest in a few clicks. Simple.

Ultimately, most of my favorite photos get sent to Flickr. As a bonus to all of this, when using Fraser Speirs’ excellent Flickr Export for Aperture uploading tool, all the GPS data is passed along from Aperture on export, and automatically added to Flickr.

In typical Apple fashion, Aperture 3 now takes something that I was interested in, but hesitant to jump into because there wasn’t a simple path to entry, and makes it even more user friendly than I could have imagined. It’s also interesting to watch how Apple has taken what is arguably the most consumer-friendly device ever, and leveraged its ubiquity to make an impact on one of their Pro apps. Geo-location data is something that I’ll always be happy to have connected to my photos, and now with this update, I don’t imagine ever not including it.

Comments (View)
Saturday, November 7, 2009

Quick Thoughts On Droid

I had a chance to play with a Droid phone earlier today for a couple of minutes. A few random, quick thoughts:

  • The onscreen keyboard actually seems over-sensitive. Every other letter I typed seemed to show up twice. The iPhone keyboard letters enlarge and pop-up when you move your finger over them, giving you a bit of visual feedback. The Droid keyboard seemed to duplicate inputs unexpectedly.

  • The screen itself was great. Super clear and crisp. I was not, however, a fan of the overall look of the interface. Google gets knocks for their design, and I felt the same way here. The polish wasn’t there. The top menu bar was a disaster, filled with crammed icons that seemed unnecessary and unclear. It reminded me of the top menu bar on a 1999 Nokia candybar phone than a modern smartphone.

  • The phone felt solid, yet clunky, both physically and design-wise. The slide out keyboard was usable, but the physical markings on the outside of the phone are made for portait use. When you slide the keyboard and rotate to landscape, the screen rotates, but the four physical home buttons on the bottom, of course, do not. That means that they’re sideways when you hit them. Obviously this is something you can get used to, but it’s also something that other companies would never allow.

I want the Droid to succeed. I want the Pre to succeed. The competition is good. Other than people that are having so many problems with AT&T that they need a new provider, I can’t see many people that are iPhone users going in that direction. You’re too used to how it works, and the little refinements.

Everyone’s heard countless stories of people going into an Apple Store, playing with an iPhone for a few minutes, and saying “I have to have this.” There’s a wow factor, and it’s immediate. I just don’t think that’s there with the Droid. It’s got a lot of great features that can match the iPhone point for point in many cases, but the overall impact wasn’t there for me. Like Lebowski’s rug, there’s something about the iPhone that ties all the pieces together—it’s greater than the sum of its parts. The Droid feels like just parts.

Comments (View)
Saturday, October 3, 2009

Flickr App & EXIF data

I was browsing through Flickr earlier and I noticed this photo from Gruber. The tags showed that it was processed with the Best Camera app, but the EXIF data was still there. Hmm. I also noticed that the photo was uploaded with the official Flickr app. I decided to test some things out (I did the same tests with Camera Bag as well, with the same results).

  1. Uploading a photo from the desktop via the Safari does not maintain the EXIF.
  2. Uploading a photo via email from within Best Camera does not maintain the EXIF.
  3. Uploading a photo from the iPhone camera roll—that has been processed in Best Camera—via the Flickr app does maintain the EXIF.

What’s very interesting is that the EXIF data doesn’t appear when you check for it in Preview, yet the Flickr app keeps it. It does not appear to keep geolocation data, but the Flickr app allows you to “Tag Current Location” so if you’re uploading on the spot taken, it’s accurate (however, I tested it with a photo taken in NYC, and it tagged it as my home in Boston).

I’m not clear on exactly how this is happening, but until 3rd party apps are able to maintain the EXIF data, this is a great workaround.

I threw all my test photos into a Flickr set

Comments (View)
Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Thoughts from last night

Last Fall I unexpectedly found myself standing directly across from Senator John McCain. This was at the height of the Presidential campaign, and this was a full on PR moment. Secret Service, PR people, shaking hands, and fake smiles. I didn’t want to be rude, but I wanted nothing to do with this show, so I stepped back and let him pass.

Thinking back on that moment tonight, after hearing of the death of Senator Ted Kennedy, I realize how different that moment would have been if it were he, instead of McCain. Of course, Kennedy wouldn’t have been a Presidential candidate at that point, so there would have been a lot less pomp and circumstance.

Still, if I had had the opportunity to say hello to, and shake the hand of, Ted Kennedy, it would be a moment that I would hold dear, and always remember.

Politics are strange.

Comments (View)
Friday, August 21, 2009

What is going on with Twitter spam?

In the past 24 hours, I’ve probably gotten 40 new followers that were all a variation of the same type of spam. They all had an almost identical avatar, and all had one update with a spammy email address.

I woke up this morning, and this is what I saw:

I know that spam is a fact of life, but the thing is bothersome is the amount of people that are following these spammers back. This one account is following 1,300+ people, and has 81 people following back. Who are these people? There is no reason that anyone for any reason would choose to follow this account. They’re just all other spammers and people that are auto-following anyone that followers them. I guess if these people figure they can get a 5% return follow rate, it’s worth it. The problem is, the others clearly don’t read a word that they say. It’s nothing more than a spam echo-chamber, and it’s annoying.

I wish Twitter would figure out a way to block auto-following, and it would get rid of a lot—if not most—of this. I’d guess that if there was no auto-following these spammers would have almost no return followers.

I could just ignore this, but for some reason this is so clear and obvious that it annoys the hell out of me.

Comments (View)
Friday, July 10, 2009

iPhones and iPhoto and Aperture—Oh My!

I haven’t been happy with using Aperture and iPhoto simultaneously for a long time. I’ve wanted to get all my needed photos into one app to make everything (iPhone/Apple TV syncing) more simple, but never really got around to it. It was one of those “I’ll get to it at some point”-type projects.

Fast forward to iPhone 3.0 software. All of the sudden my backups were taking much longer than they used to. Not the eight-hour horror stories I’ve heard some people talk about, but probably 5x as long as they had previously. I poked around a bit to see what people were saying about this. Some pointed to specific apps that may be the problem; some recommended deleting and re-installing all 3rd party apps. Somewhere else I saw a reference to backups in 3.0 handling photos on the iPhone’s camera roll differently than it did before (I’m not even sure if this is actually true; actually the more I think about it it doesn’t seem true—but it got me thinking). It suggested syncing all photos from the camera roll to iPhoto or Aperture (or whatever), deleting all photos from the camera roll, and then re-syncing from the album in iPhoto or Aperture.

Up until then I had been doing all of my photo work in Aperture, but syncing the iPhone to iPhoto. I had a few old albums of wedding and family photos I would sync to the phone from iPhoto, and I would sync all the camera roll photos there as well. Since I started using Aperture full time a few years ago the only new photos that were ever added to iPhoto were from the iPhone.

I also chose to never delete the photos from the camera roll on the phone after import, so I had somewhere in the 1,300+ picture/screenshot range on the camera roll. (Side note: with most process related things in this area I usually have a general idea how people handle things, but I realize that I really don’t with this. Is it unusual to keep all your photos on the camera roll? Is it common? How do people sync them? I’m curious to hear).

Anyway, I’d been meaning to migrate everything to Aperture for a while like I said (for the Vault especially), so I decided to sync the phone with Aperture, create a new project just for iPhone photos and try to move to this new system.

Everything seemed good initially, but I quickly noticed a few problems. The first was that iPhoto seemed to sync all photos automatically by date, and maintain this structure when synced with the phone. When I sorted all the photos in Aperture, they would show up by date within the app, but when they synced with the phone they would be sorted by filename. Almost all of the photos are in sequential order, but there are a few batches that are not, and they would throw everything off when it synced. Not having the iPhone photos sorted by date on the phone was almost useless, as that’s really the only means you have of finding anything. Still, I figured I could fix this by doing some bulk re-names sorted by date and file name, and eventually be okay.

The second problem I noticed was a bigger concern: all the screenshots (.PNGs) I had taken were now blurry when I viewed them on the phone and in Aperture—which had never happened when syncing with iPhoto. iPhone screenshots are important to me (I used them for app reviews, and a bunch of other stuff), so this was an issue. I figured (and it was suggested to me via Twitter) that it likely had something to do with how Aperture was handling the image previews (as well as the fact that iTunes does its own optimization when it syncs to the phone). I forced Aperture to re-create the previews and they were much better (though still not great). I then deleted them all from the phone and re-synced to see if this fixed it. It did not. They were still just as blurry when viewed on the phone. Back I went to taking a closer look at preview settings (as some friends suggested on Twitter).

I have Aperture set to limit my previews to half size, and keep the quality at 8 of 12. Working primarily with large RAW files the library size can get out of hand quickly if the previews are set too high. So I started looking around for solutions. Permanently changing the preview settings was not an option. I realized that I could change the preview preferences, force new previews on just the iPhone photos and that would probably do it. But then I’d need to go and change the settings back. And then repeat the process the next time, etc., etc. This was quickly becoming a path I didn’t want to go down.

So what did I do? I re-organized all the imported photos and screenshots in iPhoto and synced them back to the phone. At least now I had a freshly cleared camera roll, and the photos would be organized and displayed properly.

And remember how I started this whole song and dance because I thought it might help my backup times? Yeah, it didn’t. Not at all.

However, there was a pretty big silver lining to this whole excercise. At one point when I was finally moving everything back to iPhoto I started thinking about the 3GS and video. I’m on a 3G now, so video is not a concern. Still, I know eventually I’ll make my way over to a 3GS and when I do, I’ll need to deal with video on the camera roll as well as photos. Since iPhoto can handle imported video alongside photos, and Aperture can’t, at the end of the day I’ll be better keeping everything that comes off of the iPhone in iPhoto moving forward.


Just like it was to in the first place.

Comments (View)
Thursday, June 25, 2009 Friday, June 12, 2009

iPhone Home Screen Organization

One of the little things about the iPhone that continues to annoy me is that there’s no easy way to organize your apps and bookmarks on the home screen. I had held out hope that something would be introduced in the 3.0 OS but, at least as far as I have seen and heard (without running 3.0 myself), this has not happened.

Apple has introduced Spotlight searching into 3.0. This will be really helpful, but still won’t do what I’m looking for. Spotlight on the iPhone looks to work much like it does on the desktop, and it should be a great way to quickly launch apps. I use Spotlight all the time to launch apps on the desktop. Still, I use the Dock for my primary apps and I like to keep it just how I like it. The same goes for the iPhone screens.

As I add more and more apps to the iPhone, I like to—in a general sense—keep them organized. The first two pages are dedicated to core apps and go-to bookmarks, page 3 may have all the photo apps, page 4 for games, etc. As anyone that’s tried to manage a bunch of apps knows, moving something from page 4 to page 1 is a pain. You have to drag it screen to screen, and the icons on the screens that you’re passing through get jumbled up as you move through them. Some people keep an empty row at the bottom of each page to avoid this, but I never liked this solution.

Recently I’ve been keeping the last screen open and using it as a sort-of holding area. Apps that I just downloaded and wanted to try out, things I may be testing, etc. all live on this page. If I like them and want to keep them around, they’ll get moved to a more organized page, and if not, they’ll be deleted. As a result, there’s usually not more than 4-5 apps on that last page.


Using The iPhone’s Dock As A Clipboard

It wasn’t until I started keeping this “test” page that I realized I could use the space here, in combination with the Dock slots, to allow the dock to act as a clipboard. This allows apps to be dropped down to the dock, and neatly moved from screen to screen without messing up the order of any of the other pages.

Here’s how I do it: Say I want to swap an app from the main screen with one on the 3rd page. What I will do is scroll to the very last page that has tons of space and then press and hold an icon until it’s ready to be moved. I’ll then move 2+ icons out of the dock and drop them on the last page. I know I can easily go back and get them afterwards.

I then go to the front page and select the app that I want to move. In this case, it’s November 2009 (the Red Sox won the World Series) and I want to move the MLB At-Bat app to the 3rd page for the off-season. I drag the MLB App to dock, and then swipe to page 3. I’ll need to move something from here to make room for MLB, so I decide to put my Flickr bookmark on page 1. I drag the Flickr bookmark to the dock, and then drag MLB At-Bat up to take it’s spot.

From there, I simply hit the home button to get back to the home screen, click and hold the Flckr bookmark until it’s ready to be moved, and then drag it up to the slot that’s been left open by MLB At-Bat.

At this point all the apps are on the screens that I want them to be on, and nothing has gotten out of order. All that’s left to do is go back to the last page and drag my primary dock apps back to where they belong. I hit the home button to lock them all in, and everything is set.

This isn’t the cleanest solution in the world, but until Apple creates a way to manually manage the app organization (via iTunes would be nice), this is pretty simple and saves a lot of headaches.

Take a look at the video below for a basic rundown of what I’m talking about. There’s a chance this is the most obvious tip in the world, but I haven’t seen anyone else mention it, so maybe it’ll be a help to some.


Comments (View)
Wednesday, June 3, 2009 Saturday, April 25, 2009

The Great CD Import of Spring 2009

About a week into my project of importing all of my music into Apple lossless, this this is how much I have gotten done.

cd-import

That’s about 200 CDs, which is a bit over 70 GB. The problem is, those are just the random CDs that were stacked next to my desk. I have about 3,000 or so more in storage in my basement.

Setting up a dedicated machine and hard drive to do this has helped. I have the MacBook sitting on the side of my desk, and I’m basically just loading discs into it all day (there is no doubt the disc drive has gotten more work in the past week than during the entire life of the machine). Setting iTunes to automatically start importing when a CD is inserted is a big help. I don’t need to even touch the keyboard. Just pop the disc in and it imports, and them ejects it when it’s done.

Still, 200 down, 3,000 to go. I’m clearly going to need to start being more selective about what I import. The idea is to keep anything that there is a remote chance I may want to listen to or reference at some point in the future, but that should still leave a decent chunk of stuff that doesn’t fall within those perimeters.

The idea is that when it’s all done, the music will live on one drive, and be backed up to the Drobo as well. After that’s all done, at some point I’ll have to tackle how it integrates with my primary iTunes library. Right now it’s separate, and I want to keep it that way for now. Wish me luck, I’m curious if and when I’ll finally finish this all.

Comments (View)
Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Music for the morning: Shady Grove

Shady Grove
It doesn’t matter whether you’re a Grateful Dead fan or not, this is simply an amazing album. Soulful Americana bluegrass banjo mandolin goodness. I can’t believe this came out 12+ years ago. What a release. It’s been far too long since I’ve listened to it. And if for some reason you think of Jerry Garcia only as an old hippie that noodled on his guitar and sang “Truckin’,” well, you should really give this a listen. Beautiful music.

iTunes linkage

Comments (View)
Monday, March 30, 2009
Selectism

I’m honored to have recently started contributing a column to Selectism, a site I’ve been a fan of for a long time. If you’re at all interested in fashion and culture, you should be checking Selectism out (if you’re not already). They have a really cool and diverse group of columnists already, and I couldn’t be happier to join their ranks. Check it out!

Comments (View)
Friday, March 27, 2009

I mentioned last week that I’m doing some short app reviews for Macworld. I’m going to throw the links to them up here, as much for me to keep track of as anything, but also in case anyone is interested.

Comments (View)
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 Thursday, February 26, 2009

Insane in the Meme-brane

I’m not big on the these Facebook “25 Things” memes that have become so popular. In fact, I mentioned publicly that I wouldn’t do one. My friend Brian’s response, however, did get me thinking. It’s really the idea of tagging X number of people, and expecting them to respond that seemed to rub me the wrong way. I can’t take all that pressure man. Tagging a specified number of people and expecting them to do the same wasn’t that far from Bill Gates sending me a dollar for every person I sent it to, or having seven years of bad luck wished upon the House Of Colburn for every person below the magic number.

I liked Brian’s idea of not tagging anyone, but simply encouraging people that were interested to jump in on their own. Since I started thinking about that a few weeks ago, I think at least 685 or so new memes have popped up.

There’s one that I noticed in the past few days that seemed different, and pretty cool—this “album cover” deal. It was actually the only one that I saw and wanted to participate in before anyone had tagged me. I knew my time would come.

Luckily my friend Ed (author of the fantastic site Quality Peoples—go read it, it’s one of my favorites) tagged me with this action today, so I took a closer look. He’s also got a nice rundown of what this whole meme is/may be about.

I have no design background or anything like that, but I like to play around with images and Photoshop-y type things (actually Acorn), so I messed around for a bit and had a lot of fun doing it.

I ended up tagging a bunch of people in the album meme because a) I thought it was fun and different, and b) it seems like once you take away that idea that “Once you’re tagged you must do XYZ or else” it becomes pretty laid back and those that want to have fun with it can, and everyone else can ignore it.

So without further adieu, I present you with the debut album by Abi People. They’re gonna be big.

facebook album meme photo credit: rizky nur adrianto

Debut Album

MAKE YOUR OWN RECORD ALBUM COVER FROM RANDOM ONLINE STUFF

1 - Go to “wikipedia.” Hit “random” or click http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random The first random wikipedia article you get is the name of your band.

2 - Go to “Random quotations” or click http://www.quotationspage.com/random.php The last four or five words of the very last quote of the page is the title of your first album.

3 - Go to flickr and click on “explore the last seven days” or click http://www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/7days Third picture, no matter what it is, will be your album cover.

4 - Use photoshop or similar (piknik is a free online photo editor…easy to use) to put it all together.

5 - Post it with this text in the “caption” and TAG the friends you want to join in.

If you’re interested, click on that link over on the side and hit me up on Facebook.


PS—it also occurs to me that I may have really over thought this whole thing…

Comments (View)